Centerton Planning Commission Recap: March 17, 2026

by Allie Verdery, The Blue Haired Broker

Centerton Planning Commission Recap: March 17, 2026

Short term rentals, 49 new lots, and the zoning details that quietly shape residential life

Some Planning Commission meetings are about major new projects.

This one was more about how residential neighborhoods are managed as Centerton grows.

A short term rental request in Centerpoint. A final plat for 49 single family lots in Huber Place. A property line adjustment on a large estate tract. And another long discussion about the city’s Schedule of Uses, which is the rulebook for what can go where.

If you own a home in Centerton, these details matter.

They affect parking.
They affect neighborhood feel.
They affect how new subdivisions are finalized.
They affect what kinds of businesses and services may eventually be allowed near homes.

Here’s what happened.

Approval of Minutes

The Planning Commission approved the March 3, 2026 meeting minutes.

No opposition.

Administrative Approval

King Trust Property Line Adjustment

13301 LC Hickman Road
Zoned Residential Estate

The Commission ratified a property line adjustment for the Jesse W. King Trust property.

The parent tract is just over 95 acres. The adjustment creates:

• Tract 1 at 5.94 acres
• Tract 2 at 88.81 acres

This was handled as an administrative approval and passed without opposition.

What this means for residential real estate

Property line adjustments are usually quiet agenda items, but they still matter.

They can clean up ownership lines, prepare land for future estate use, help with transfers, or set the table for future planning decisions.

This one did not involve a subdivision discussion or new residential lots. It was simply a property line adjustment on a large residential estate zoned tract.

New Business

Riazzi Short Term Rental

501 Sun Meadow Drive
Centerpoint Phase 2
Zoned R3 Single Family

This was the public hearing item of the night.

The applicant requested conditional use approval to convert an existing long term rental into a short term rental through platforms like Airbnb and VRBO.

The property is a three bedroom, two bathroom home with 1,413 square feet, a fully fenced yard, and access from Sun Meadow Drive.

The applicant explained that the home had been used as a long term rental for years, but they now want to manage it more directly as a short term rental.

Their argument was that this could actually improve the property because they plan to:

• Take over lawn care
• Improve curb appeal
• Add landscaping
• Keep up with outdoor maintenance
• Renovate the home
• Manage housekeeping and groundskeeping more closely

They also stated they expect to rent primarily to families or business professionals.

Staff Report

Staff noted several important details.

The property is surrounded by R3 single family zoning and is connected to Centerton water and sanitary sewer.

Sun Meadow Drive is designated as a major collector on the Master Street Plan and functions as a north and south connection between West Centerton Boulevard and Bliss Street.

That matters because this is already a busier residential street.

Staff also pointed out that Sun Meadow Drive is only 23 feet wide and is not designed for on street parking. It is not currently signed as no parking, but the road width does not safely support parking along the street.

The existing driveway and two car garage provide:

• Two covered parking spaces
• Two uncovered parking spaces

Because of the street width, staff recommended that the garage be available for guest parking.

The applicant agreed.

They also agreed to put no street parking in the rental listing.

Public Comment

One Centerpoint resident, Sandra Allen, spoke during the public hearing.

Her concerns centered on:

• Parking on Sun Meadow Drive
• Traffic flow on an already busy street
• The precedent this could set for other short term rentals nearby
• How short term is defined
• Foot traffic in and out of the home
• Whether more than six people could stay there

Staff clarified that short term means a maximum stay of 30 days.

Commission Chair Jeff Seyfarth also explained that approving this short term rental does not automatically approve others nearby.

Any future short term rental would have to go through the same conditional use process, including a public hearing.

That distinction matters.

This approval is property specific.
It is not a blanket approval for the whole neighborhood.

The resident also asked whether the conditions would be public. The Commission explained that the meeting is public record, the recording is available through the city’s YouTube channel, and the approval letter would list the conditions.

Staff also explained that the applicant would need to receive the approval letter and obtain a business license before operating the short term rental.

Commission Discussion

Most of the Commission discussion focused on parking.

The chair asked about the driveway length and whether it could accommodate enough vehicles.

The applicant said the driveway could probably fit four compact cars, but they expect most stays to involve only one vehicle.

They also said the garage would be made available.

The Commission requested that no street parking be clearly included in the rental listing.

The applicant agreed.

There were no further commissioner questions after the public hearing.

Outcome

The short term rental was approved unanimously.

Craig Langford recused himself from this item and rejoined after the vote.

What this means for homeowners

This is a good example of how Centerton is currently handling short term rentals.

They are not automatic.
They are not banned.
They are reviewed case by case.

For homeowners, the key takeaways are:

• Parking matters
• Street width matters
• Neighbor concerns are heard publicly
• Conditions can be attached
• Complaints can bring the use back for review
• Each property must go through its own process

For neighborhoods, this process gives some oversight while still allowing property owners flexibility.

For buyers, it is a reminder that short term rental potential should never be assumed. You need to confirm zoning, subdivision rules, city process, parking, and business license requirements before building a plan around STR income.

Huber Place Phase 2 Final Plat and Bonds

North Tycoon Road
49 Buildable Lots
49 Dwelling Units
Zoned R3 Single Family

The next item was the final plat and bonds for Huber Place Phase 2.

This phase includes:

• 11.29 acres
• 49 buildable single family lots
• 49 dwelling units
• Density of 4.34 units per acre

The applicant, represented by Halff Associates, explained that this is Phase 2 of Huber Place and highlighted one key issue from final inspection.

There were curb and gutter concerns related to construction joints, so the developer is providing a separate three year, 100 percent bond for curb and gutter.

Staff Report

Staff confirmed:

• Street improvements have been completed
• Covenants were approved with Phase 1
• Right of way dedication for Huber Road was completed with Phase 1
• Bond amounts have been approved
• Minor comments remain on the draft bonds
• Final inspection was completed on December 11, 2025
• The site passed final inspection
• No reinspection is required

Staff also noted that the property is not in a designated floodplain and no wetlands are present on site.

Any wells and septic systems have been handled according to state and local requirements.

The streets, drainage, water, and sewer bond estimates have been approved, with staff still reviewing the final bond drafts for accuracy.

Road and Infrastructure Details

Huber Road was already handled with Phase 1.

That included:

• 90 feet of right of way
• 38 feet of pavement
• Curb and gutter
• Storm drainage
• Green space
• Sidewalks
• Street trees

North Tycoon Road improvements were also discussed, including pavement, curb and gutter, drainage, street trees, and sidewalks.

This is the behind the scenes infrastructure work that matters before homes can be built and occupied.

Outcome

The final plat and bonds for Huber Place Phase 2 were approved.

No opposition.

What this means for residential real estate

This is 49 more single family lots moving through the final plat stage.

That matters because new construction inventory in Centerton has been heavily affected by infrastructure timing, sewer capacity, and final approval steps.

Final plat approval does not always mean homes appear overnight, but it is a major step toward lots becoming buildable.

For buyers, this means more future new construction options.

For nearby homeowners, it means more homes, more neighbors, and more activity in that part of town.

For the market overall, every batch of lots matters right now because inventory, builder timelines, and infrastructure capacity all affect pricing pressure.

Other Business

Schedule of Uses

Commercial and Industrial Zoning

The rest of the meeting focused on the Schedule of Uses.

This is the city’s detailed list of what uses are permitted, conditional, or not allowed in different zoning districts.

It sounds dry, but this is one of the most important pieces of long term planning.

It decides what can be built near homes, what requires public review, and where certain uses belong.

The Commission continued working through items that needed more research from the previous meeting.

Cemeteries and Mausoleums

The first major discussion was whether cemeteries and mausoleums should be permitted or conditional in commercial zoning.

Staff had suggested allowing them by right in C2, which is highway commercial.

The Commission pushed back.

The discussion included questions about:

• Parking during funerals
• Setbacks
• Lighting
• Gates and fencing
• Whether commercial highway property is the right fit
• Whether this use is better handled conditionally

The Commission leaned toward keeping cemeteries and mausoleums conditional rather than automatically permitted.

Why it matters for homeowners

Even uses that seem quiet still affect land use.

A cemetery may not generate daily traffic like a store, but it can still raise questions about access, lighting, appearance, parking, and long term land use.

Conditional review gives the city more control over how it fits into the surrounding area.

Emergency Services

The Commission then discussed emergency services, including fire and police facilities.

Staff suggested making emergency services permitted in all commercial zoning categories.

The main reason is practical: emergency services need flexibility to locate where response times and coverage require them.

Deputy Fire Chief Paul Higginbotham explained that station placement affects ISO ratings, which can affect insurance costs. He also explained that the fire department no longer automatically leaves stations with sirens blaring the way people may imagine, and that sirens are used with discretion.

Commissioners discussed the tension between:

• Public safety needs
• Noise concerns
• Residential proximity
• Commercial zoning near neighborhoods
• The importance of response times

The conversation landed around allowing emergency services more easily in C1 and C2, while keeping C3 neighborhood commercial conditional because of its closer relationship to housing.

Why it matters for homeowners

This is a classic growth balance.

No one wants unnecessary noise near their home.

But everyone wants quick emergency response.

The zoning code has to make room for public safety infrastructure while still respecting neighborhood context.

Government Agencies

Government offices and agency uses were also discussed.

This category is different from emergency services. The Commission seemed comfortable keeping the existing approach without major changes.

The distinction matters because a City Hall or utility office is different from a fire station or police station.

Jail, Detention Facility, Prison, and Correctional Facility

This one involved some definition cleanup.

Staff recommended splitting the existing category into:

• Jail and detention facility
• Prison and correctional facility

The idea is that a small detention component tied to a police department is very different from a full prison or correctional facility.

The Commission seemed comfortable with the split.

Jails or detention facilities could be considered conditionally in some commercial contexts. Prisons and correctional facilities would be treated differently and pushed toward industrial zoning rather than commercial areas.

Why it matters for residential real estate

Definitions matter.

When zoning categories are too broad, residents can get surprised by uses they did not expect.

Separating smaller detention facilities from larger correctional institutions gives the city more precision.

That is good planning.

Microbrewery and Restaurant

The Commission also revisited alcohol manufacturing, microbreweries, and restaurants.

The discussion focused on removing the broad phrase alcohol manufacturing and narrowing the use to microbrewery and restaurant.

The idea was to distinguish a small consumer facing microbrewery from larger scale manufacturing or distribution.

The Commission discussed allowing microbrewery and restaurant uses in C1 and C2, with conditional review in C3.

Why it matters for neighborhoods

This is another scale and compatibility issue.

A small downtown brewery with food is one thing.

A large production facility is another.

The city is trying to make sure the code reflects that difference.

Grocery Stores and Retail

Staff suggested keeping grocery stores under retail rather than treating them as a separate category.

The conversation also tied into the city’s retail size categories.

Smaller retail and larger retail have different impacts, especially when looking at neighborhood commercial areas.

The Commission discussed how big box stores, neighborhood commercial, and larger retail footprints should be handled.

Why it matters for homeowners

A small neighborhood market can be an asset.

A large big box store changes traffic, lighting, delivery patterns, and parking demand.

The size category matters because it helps separate neighborhood scale convenience from regional scale retail.

Restaurants by Size

The Commission also discussed restaurants by size.

The general idea was to separate smaller restaurants from larger restaurants, similar to retail categories.

A small restaurant may fit more easily near neighborhoods. A larger restaurant can have bigger impacts through parking, traffic, hours, and noise.

There was also discussion about restaurants in industrial areas.

Commissioners questioned whether restaurants should be allowed in heavier industrial areas, or whether food trucks and conditional uses would be a better fit for serving employees in those districts.

The direction seemed to be:

• Smaller restaurants stay focused in commercial zones
• Larger restaurants may be conditional in some areas
• Industrial restaurant uses should be limited and reviewed carefully

Retail in Industrial Areas

The Commission discussed whether retail belongs in industrial zoning.

There was concern that heavy industrial land should remain available for true industrial uses, especially because Centerton has limited industrial land.

However, they also discussed that some retail style uses may fit in light industrial, such as farm supply or larger service oriented retail.

The general theme was to avoid using heavy industrial land for uses that belong in commercial corridors.

Why it matters for residential real estate

This affects the city’s tax base and land use balance.

If industrial land gets eaten up by uses that could go elsewhere, the city may have fewer places for jobs, services, and economic activity that support the broader community.

That indirectly affects homeowners because a stronger local tax base can help support services without putting as much pressure on residential property.

New Uses Being Considered

The Commission then discussed several uses that are not currently well defined in the code.

Data Centers

Data centers came up as a new possible use.

Staff suggested placing them in industrial and warehousing categories and making them conditional in I2.

Commissioners discussed concerns around:

• Electricity demand
• Water demand
• Noise
• Environmental effects
• State level activity around data centers

The Commission did not treat this lightly.

They seemed to agree that if data centers are going to be addressed, they should require review rather than being allowed automatically.

Why it matters

Data centers are becoming a bigger land use topic nationally and regionally.

They can bring investment, but they can also create major utility and infrastructure demands.

For a fast growing city already working through sewer, water, and power related growth pressures, conditional review makes sense.

Aquarium

Aquariums were discussed as a new use, likely under tourism or entertainment style categories.

The Commission seemed open to adding aquariums to the Schedule of Uses, with different treatment depending on zoning district.

This is not because an aquarium is necessarily coming tomorrow. It is about making sure the code is prepared for modern uses.

Landscape Material Sales

The Commission discussed landscape material sales, especially outdoor or bulk sales.

Think mulch, rock, soil, or landscape supply where trucks may load materials.

This use sits somewhere between retail, service, and industrial.

The discussion leaned toward allowing it conditionally in highway commercial and permitting it in light industrial.

That fit makes sense because bulk outdoor material sales can involve trucks, storage piles, and loading activity that may not belong next to homes.

Taxidermy

Taxidermy came up as another possible use.

The Commission discussed whether it fits in commercial, industrial, agricultural, or even home based contexts.

There was not a clean conclusion in the discussion, and it sounded like more research may be needed.

Sidewalk Cafe

Sidewalk cafes were also discussed.

Commissioners debated whether this should be its own category or simply fall under restaurant use.

The challenge is that a sidewalk cafe can mean different things:

• Outdoor seating tied to a restaurant
• A walk up window
• Seating near a public sidewalk
• A courtyard style cafe in a mixed use setting

Because the definition could be interpreted several ways, the Commission seemed to want more research before deciding how to handle it.

EV Charging Stations

EV charging stations brought up an interesting parking discussion.

The question was whether EV charging should be its own land use or handled through development standards.

Staff raised concerns that businesses could add charging spaces and still count them toward required parking, even if some users are only there to charge and not actually use the business.

Commissioners talked through whether this is really a Schedule of Uses issue or more of a Title 15 parking and site design issue.

They did not seem ready to finalize that one and wanted more clarity.

Why this matters for residents

EV charging sounds minor until it affects parking.

At apartments, retail centers, or mixed use projects, charging spaces can change how parking functions.

This is exactly why these detailed zoning conversations matter.

Landfills

Landfills were another major topic.

Staff had listed landfill as a possible industrial and warehousing use, but the Commission immediately questioned whether Centerton should allow landfills at all.

There was discussion about whether it should be conditional in agricultural zoning or removed entirely, along with a request for more research on state law.

The Commission was clearly cautious.

Music and Dance Venues

The final zoning discussion centered on music and dance venues.

The issue was where they fit.

Are they event venues?
Are they indoor assembly uses?
Are they outdoor entertainment uses?
Do they need to be separate because of noise, parking, and late night activity?

Staff noted that assembly uses in retail spaces can create parking problems because retail parking calculations and event venue parking needs are not always the same.

The Commission discussed separating indoor and outdoor event venue style uses, with outdoor venues needing more review because of sound and neighborhood impact.

Why it matters for homeowners

Noise and parking are two of the biggest friction points between commercial activity and nearby homes.

Getting this right in the zoning code can prevent future conflicts.

Announcements

The next City Council meeting is scheduled for April 14, 2026.

The next Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for April 7, 2026.

The next Tech Review meeting is scheduled for March 19, 2026.

The meeting adjourned at 7:24 PM.

My Takeaways for Centerton Homeowners

This meeting had three big residential takeaways.

1. Short term rentals are being reviewed individually

The Riazzi STR approval shows that Centerton is not treating short term rentals as a free for all.

The Commission looked at parking, street width, occupancy, neighbor concerns, and conditions.

That process matters for residential neighborhoods.

2. New lots are still moving forward

Huber Place Phase 2 adds 49 single family lots to the pipeline.

In a market where infrastructure and sewer capacity have slowed some development, every final plat matters.

It affects future inventory and buyer options.

3. Zoning cleanup is neighborhood protection

The Schedule of Uses conversation may sound technical, but it is really about daily life.

Where can emergency services go?
Where can large restaurants go?
Where do event venues belong?
Should data centers be conditional?
How should EV charging affect parking?
Should landfills be allowed at all?

These are not abstract questions.

They shape what gets built near homes.

What This Means for Residential Real Estate

Real estate is not just what is listed today.

It is also what is being approved, revised, debated, and defined before most residents ever hear about it.

For Centerton homeowners, this meeting touched on:

• Short term rental oversight
• Neighborhood parking concerns
• New construction inventory
• Infrastructure standards
• Commercial compatibility near homes
• Future zoning protections
• How the city balances growth with livability

That is why I keep watching these meetings.

Because the details matter long before they show up in a listing description or a sales price.

Let’s Talk Strategy

If you are thinking about buying or selling in Centerton, or if you want to understand how nearby development could affect your home’s value, your neighborhood, or your future plans, let’s talk.

I follow the details so you do not have to.

Allie Verdery, The Blue Haired Broker
Centerton Luxury Real Estate Advisor
Engel & Völkers Bentonville

314.517.3196
allie.verdery@evrealestate.com
thebluehairedbroker.com

Bookmark the blog and check back after the next meeting. I’ll keep translating Planning Commission into real world real estate context.

Allie Verdery

Allie Verdery

Broker Associate | License ID: AB00084707

+1(314) 517-3196

GET MORE INFORMATION

Name
Phone*
Message